AI-powered financial planning
Position
A customer's willingness to discuss finances depends on their financial literacy and comfort with money conversations
Problems
With no immediate means of filling in knowledge gaps or managing anxiety about future money planning, dropout rates were very high
Possibilities
Explore how a succinct storytelling mechanic could improve comprehension and conversion
Design process
Discovery
Customers fell into two primary categories:
20 to 30. Low-income demographic, predominantly students, with minimal financial experience
30 to 40. Early-to-mid career professionals raising young families while navigating housing costs
Insight
Both groups were often either unaware of what was possible/available to them or were experiencing a type of decision-paralysis, based on the belief that looking after money meant investing in high-risk products or cutting back on expenditure, something they felt they couldn’t do. Ultimately, most people felt uninformed and not in control of their financial futures.
Exploration
I began by exploring how to categorise key life stages according to people's ages and discovered several similarities across different groups. Rather than creating a cold, unemotional questionnaire, the typical approach to information gathering, I recognised that major life transitions deserve a more empathetic response. The question became: How could Lloyds demonstrate genuine understanding and provide solutions beyond conventional marketing and/or form-based information gathering?
This led me to realise that authentic conversations are essential to creating the right environment for knowledge sharing. I identified storytelling as a powerful mechanism that could showcase how Lloyds supports customers regardless of their age or life stage, creating meaningful connections through shared human experiences rather than generic financial messaging.
Concept 1.1. Explore key life stages via three most common decades
Pros Visceral / Low cognitive load / Fast access to benefits of planning
Cons Not enough key stages per decade / Isn’t representative enough
Concept 1.2. Explore a typical timeline per decade
Pros More choices to explore / Visceral / Low cognitive load / Fast access to benefits of financial planning
Cons Key stages might be taken in a different order and therefore feel too prescriptive
Concept 1.3. Key life stages, via a non-age-specific, decade-based timeline
Pros Less prescriptive / More choices to explore / Visceral / Low cognitive load / Fast access to benefits of planning
Cons Less prescriptive than 1.2 but, not everyone follows these stages per decade
Concept 1.4. Key life stages in a non-chronological order.
Added an AI voice-powered Coach to guide and educate
Note, AI can lip-read, ideal for privacy or when background noise levels are high
Pros Fewer steps / AI acts as an educator and advisor / Non-prescriptive / More choices to explore / Visceral / Low cognitive load / Fast access to benefits of planning
Cons AI might require an easy-to-negotiate re-adjustment curve
Conclusion + Results
5-out-of-5 Testers, and the Business, preferred the final concept, 1.4. However, AI at Lloyds was felt to be in its infancy and not capable of ramping up fast enough to deliver something like that. Seen as a valuable exploration and indication of how AI could be used, in the end, version 1.3 was chosen and went into production with another team.